Filtering Techniques

Filtering techniques are the convergence step of a retro. The team has surfaced a wall of cards; now it has to pick one to act on without the senior person's preference deciding for everyone.

What it is

Filtering is the move between divergence (everyone writes) and commitment (the team picks one). Dot voting is the default, but the category is wider — Roman vote (continue/extend/move on), Fist of Five (confidence). The technique you pick changes the result. Stacking dots produces a clear winner; spreading them produces a long list. Anonymous voting kills the seniority anchor; visible voting reinstates it. Roman vote and Fist of Five are techniques, not standalone activities — they live inside other formats (Lean Coffee, planning sessions). Pick the technique that matches the decision you actually need.

When to use

Any time a retro, brainstorm, or planning session has surfaced more options than the team can act on. Skip filtering when there are fewer than five items — at that scale, just talk it through. Skip the formal vote when the team already agrees: an unnecessary vote can manufacture disagreement that wasn't there. And skip the open vote when seniority will skew the result; senior person votes last on dots, or the vote goes anonymous, or you measured the senior person's preference dressed as consensus.

Which one to pick

Choosing among 5+ items, want a clear winner
Dot voting. Three dots, vote silently, senior person votes last.
Inside Lean Coffee, deciding to extend or move on
Roman vote (thumbs up / sideways / down). The technique is the decision rhythm of Lean Coffee — it doesn't live alone.
Confidence check before commitment to a plan
Fist of Five. A 1 or 2 means surface the concern before voting again — the action loop is the load-bearing element.
Prioritisation across many options
Dot voting. Different shape of question to Fist of Five — Fist is confidence on one decision, dots are prioritisation across many.
Binary or near-binary decision (do we extend, do we ship)
Roman vote. Three states maximum — yes, extend, no.
Distributed team where seniority would skew the room
Anonymous dot voting. Visible voting reinstates the anchor you ran the format to remove.

Common mistakes

  • Letting the senior person vote first on dots. Whatever they pick, the room follows. Senior votes last, or anonymous, or you measured one person's preference.
  • Running a vote when the team already agrees. The format manufactures disagreement that wasn't there — you'll spend ten minutes recovering from a non-decision.
  • Treating Roman vote or Fist of Five as a standalone activity. They're techniques inside other formats. Don't book a meeting for them.
  • Stopping at the result of the vote. A 1 or 2 on Fist of Five is the start of the conversation, not the end — surface the concern, re-vote.
  • Picking dot voting for a confidence check. Different shape of question — dots prioritise, Fist of Five measures conviction. Use the right tool.

All filtering techniques