Filtering techniques are the convergence step of a retro. The team has surfaced a wall of cards; now it has to pick one to act on without the senior person's preference deciding for everyone.
Filtering is the move between divergence (everyone writes) and commitment (the team picks one). Dot voting is the default, but the category is wider — Roman vote (continue/extend/move on), Fist of Five (confidence). The technique you pick changes the result. Stacking dots produces a clear winner; spreading them produces a long list. Anonymous voting kills the seniority anchor; visible voting reinstates it. Roman vote and Fist of Five are techniques, not standalone activities — they live inside other formats (Lean Coffee, planning sessions). Pick the technique that matches the decision you actually need.
Any time a retro, brainstorm, or planning session has surfaced more options than the team can act on. Skip filtering when there are fewer than five items — at that scale, just talk it through. Skip the formal vote when the team already agrees: an unnecessary vote can manufacture disagreement that wasn't there. And skip the open vote when seniority will skew the result; senior person votes last on dots, or the vote goes anonymous, or you measured the senior person's preference dressed as consensus.
Three dots, vote silently, the senior person votes last. Anything else is a popularity contest with a sticker budget.
A technique that lives inside Lean Coffee. Thumbs up extends; thumbs down moves on; sideways is the warning sign.
A confidence check before commitment, not a vote. The signal is the low end.